Correspondence Address: Dr. Elia Armellini Department of Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria “Maggiore Della Carità”, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara 28100 Italy
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
How to cite this article: Armellini E, Leutner M, Stradella D, Ballarè M, Occhipinti P. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation: an option for the extrapancreatic region. Endosc Ultrasound 2018;7:282-3
How to cite this URL: Armellini E, Leutner M, Stradella D, Ballarè M, Occhipinti P. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation: an option for the extrapancreatic region. Endosc Ultrasound [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Jun 27];7:282-3. Available from: http://www.eusjournal.com/text.asp?2018/7/4/282/227150
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) achieves tumor necrosis by cell protein denaturation, induced by tissue heating above 45°C to obtain irreversible cellular injury. Energy is supplied by a generator connected to an active electrode tip inserted into the tumor.
RFA was developed in the early nineties for percutaneous or intraoperative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is recommended by the EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines for early-stage disease (not eligible for surgery).[1]
Today, RFA is widely used in the treatment of HCC and has been given attention as a potential treatment for many tumors (e.g., kidney, lung, and bone).
Recently, new devices have been used to perform RFA through linear echoendoscopes, for targeting focal pancreatic lesions (neuroendocrine tumors, adenocarcinomas, and pancreatic cysts).[2],[3],[4]
Moreover, the left lobe of the liver can be well visualized using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), making it amenable to EUS-guided interventional procedures, including ablations.[5]
A 76-year-old HBV/HCV-cirrhotic female presenting with portal hypertension and ascites had been diagnosed with HCC on radiological imaging (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A: Child–Pugh B8/Performance status: 1), but she was deemed unfit for surgery. She was, therefore, referred for EUS-guided sampling of hilar lymph nodes, in view of further management of a suspicious HCC in the fourth segment of her liver [Figure 1]a,[Figure 1]b,[Figure 1]c. Sampling of the hepatic nodule and the lymph nodes resulted in a diagnosis of well-differentiated HCC and reactive adenopathies [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Abdominal computed tomography shows a 30-mm nodule with diffuse hyperenhancement in the arterial phase, and slow wash out in the portal and late phases (a-c). After 1 month, an abdominal computed tomography scan shows a large ablated area in the arterial, portal, and late phases (d-f)
Figure 2: High-power images show pseudoglandular aggregates of atypical epithelial cells (a) (H and E, ×400). Gomori's staining (b) highlights the presence of neoplastic pseudoglandular structures (×400). CD34 immunostaining demonstrates sinusoidal capillarization (c), a typical change that characterizes the endothelial cells of hepatocellular carcinoma (×200)
Considering the easy approach provided by EUS and obstacles to the percutaneous route (large umbilical hernia), the nodule was ablated with EUS guidance (GIF-160 Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using a 20-mm active tip water-cooled electrode needle (EUSRA™ RF Electrode-VIVA RF Generator, STARmed, Seoul Korea).
The procedure required three passes at five positions, using a multi-pass technique that allowed a larger ablation. [Video 1] shows the insertion of the needle inside the HCC and the development of air bubbles near the electrode tip ( first pass). Later, a panoramic view shows a large hyperechoic halo occupying the nodule. This marked the conclusion of the procedure, after a total of 30 min of energy application (starting power 30 W).
An ultrasound imaging contrast (Sonovue®, Bracco, Italy) was administered during the procedure for marking the ablated area (nonenhancing tissue) and targeting further insertions. No adverse event was observed, and the patient was discharged on the 3rd postoperative day. One month later, computed tomography scan showed a large ablated area [Figure 1]d,[Figure 1]e,[Figure 1]f.
This case highlights the possibilities for an EUS-guided transluminal approach to perform RFA of extrapancreatic neoplasms, such as a liver lesion, when percutaneous or surgical treatments are technically challenging or prohibitive.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initial will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal her identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:908-43.
Song TJ, Seo DW, Lakhtakia S, et al. Initial experience of EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:440-3. [PUBMED]
Armellini E, Crinò SF, Ballarè M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Endoscopy 2015;47 Suppl 1 UCTN: E600-1.
Pai M, Habib N, Senturk H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation, for pancreatic cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2015;7:52-9. [PUBMED]
Jiang TA, Deng Z, Tian G, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided interventional treatment for refractory malignant left-sided liver tumors: A case series of 26 patients. Sci Rep 2016;6:36098. [PUBMED]
Search Pubmed for