|
|
IMAGES AND VIDEOS |
|
Year : 2020 | Volume
: 9
| Issue : 6 | Page : 415-416 |
|
Histopathological and molecular study from EUS fine-needle biopsy of a programmed cell death ligand 1 positive, KRAS mutated pancreatic metastasis
Quentin Tournier1, François Casteillo2, Sophie Bayle-Bleuez3, Jean-Marc Phelip1, Nicolas Williet1
1 Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital Center, Saint-Etienne, France 2 Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, University Hospital Center, Saint-Etienne, France 3 Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Center, Saint-Etienne, France
Date of Submission | 28-Apr-2020 |
Date of Acceptance | 24-Aug-2020 |
Date of Web Publication | 14-Dec-2020 |
Correspondence Address: Nicolas Williet Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez France
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_62_20
How to cite this article: Tournier Q, Casteillo F, Bayle-Bleuez S, Phelip JM, Williet N. Histopathological and molecular study from EUS fine-needle biopsy of a programmed cell death ligand 1 positive, KRAS mutated pancreatic metastasis. Endosc Ultrasound 2020;9:415-6 |
How to cite this URL: Tournier Q, Casteillo F, Bayle-Bleuez S, Phelip JM, Williet N. Histopathological and molecular study from EUS fine-needle biopsy of a programmed cell death ligand 1 positive, KRAS mutated pancreatic metastasis. Endosc Ultrasound [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Jun 25];9:415-6. Available from: http://www.eusjournal.com/text.asp?2020/9/6/415/303356 |
On December 2019, a 73-year-old Caucasian man, smoker presented for concomitant pulmonary and pancreatic tumors showed by computerized tomography. A percutaneous biopsy of the pulmonary mass led to the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated non-small cell non squamous carcinoma with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) overexpression (tumor proportion score = 100%), no staining for ALK and ROS1, and KRAS mutation (c.34G>T). By EUS, two adjacent tumors (20 mm and 13 mm) were showed in the pancreatic body and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) was performed using a 20 gauges ProCore needle [Figure 1]a. Quality of the tissue sampled was adequate for histopathological examination and immunohistochemical staining using antibodies (DAKO) including those for cytokeratin (CK7: Positive and CK20: Negative), thyroid transcription factor-1 (negative), ALK (negative), ROS1 (negative), and PD-L1: 100% of tumor cells [Figure 1]c,[Figure 1]d,[Figure 1]e,[Figure 1]f. Moreover, next-generation sequencing showed KRAS mutation (c.34G>T), exactly as the primary lung cancer [Figure 1]b. Following these results, it was concluded that pancreatic masses were metastases from the lung cancer and the patient started an anti-PD-L1 (Pembrolizumab®). | Figure 1: (a) EUS-fine needle biopsy of the two pancreatic masses. Samples issued from this EUS.fine needle biopsy allowed to conduct (b) next generation sequencing showing KRAS mutation (c.34G>T), (c) hematoxylin and eosin staining, (d) positive CK7 staining, (e) negative CK20 staining, (f) strongly positive (100%) for programmed cell death ligand 1 staining (scale bar in all panels = 200 μm)
Click here to view |
To conclude, our case report is a good example of the feasibility of a large panel of Histopathological and molecular analyses from EUS-FNB for pancreatic mass[1], in the era of molecularly targeted drugs (immunotherapy for MSI tumors, PARP inhibitors for BRCA mutated tumors, and NTRK-fusion inhibitors).
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initial will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Oppong KW, Bekkali NLH, Leeds JS, Johnson SJ, Nayar MK, Darné A, et al. Fork-tip needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2020 Mar 11; |
[Figure 1]
|