• Users Online:169
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 168-184

General principles of image optimization in EUS

1 Aryavart Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Celle, Germany
3 Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Imola, Italy
4 Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin, (DAIM) Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Hirslanden, Bern, Switzerland
5 Medical Department, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
6 Medical Department, Krankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland, D-15344 Strausberg and Brandenburg Institute of Clinical Medicine at Medical University Brandenburg, Germany

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Christoph F Dietrich
Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Hirslanden, Bern, 3036 Bern
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_80_20

Rights and Permissions

With the development of modern EUS, multiple imaging functions, transducer settings, and examination modes have become available for clinical settings. While the major determinants of the ultrasound beam are still comprised of the signal wavelength, its frequency range, and its amplitude, other modifications and calculations have gained more interest for advanced users, such as tissue harmonic imaging (THI), spatial and frequency compounding, certain versions of speckle reduction, and various Doppler/duplex settings. The goal of such techniques is a better, perhaps more realistic image, with reduced artifacts (such as speckle), better image contrast, and an improved signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, “add-ons” such as THI, which is based on the phenomenon of nonlinear distortion of acoustic signals as they travel through tissues, provide greater contrast and an enhanced spatial resolution than conventional EUS. Finally, optimization of spectral and color Doppler imaging in EUS requires experience and knowledge about the basic principles of Doppler/duplex phenomena. For these purposes, factors such as adjustment of Doppler controls, Doppler angle, color gain, spectral wall filters, and others require special attention during EUS examinations. Incorporating these advanced techniques in EUS examinations may be time-consuming and cumbersome. Hence, practical guidelines enabling endosonographers to steer safely through the large quantity of technological properties and settings (knobology) are appreciated. This review provides an overview of the role of important imaging features to be adjusted before, during, and after EUS procedures.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded219    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal