|
| |
| LETTER TO EDITOR |
|
| Ahead of print publication |
|
|
Forward-viewing EUS-guided combined coil and glue injection in bleeding gastric varices secondary to splenic vein thrombosis in chronic pancreatitis
Surinder Singh Rana1, Nikhil Bush1, Ravi Sharma1, Lovneet Dhalaria1, Rajesh Gupta2
1 Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| Date of Submission | 08-Jun-2021 |
| Date of Acceptance | 30-Nov-2021 |
| Date of Web Publication | 02-May-2022 |
Correspondence Address:
Surinder Singh Rana,
Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00142
How to cite this URL:
Rana SS, Bush N, Sharma R, Dhalaria L, Gupta R. Forward-viewing EUS-guided combined coil and glue injection in bleeding gastric varices secondary to splenic vein thrombosis in chronic pancreatitis. Endosc Ultrasound [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2022 May 22]. Available from: http://www.eusjournal.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=344246 |
Dear Editor,
Splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an important vascular complication of both acute and chronic pancreatitis, with 17%–55% of patients with SVT developing gastric varices (GVs).[1] Although bleeding from GV in SVT and pancreatitis is rare, it can be fatal. Endoscopic as well as EUS-guided N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue injection has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for bleeding GV in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis.[2] However, unlike GV in cirrhosis, experience of endoscopic glue injection in bleeding GV due to SVT and pancreatitis is limited, and the results are not so encouraging with high re-bleeding rates.[3],[4] Moreover, EUS-guided combined coil and glue injection in bleeding GV due to pancreatitis-induced SVT has not been previously studied. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided combined coil and glue injection in bleeding GV in six patients (all males; mean age: 36.1 ± 6.7 years) with bleeding GV due to chronic pancreatitis (CP)-induced SVT.
EUS was performed using a forward-viewing echoendoscope (FVE) (TGF-UC180J; Olympus Optical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).[5] The GVs were punctured using a 22G fine needle aspiration needle (Echotip; Cook Medical, Winston Salem, NC, USA), and the embolization coil (s) (8–16 mm) (Nester Embolization Coil; Cook Medical) were pushed into the GV via the needle using the stylet as a pusher [Figure 1]. After deploying adequate number of coils, 1 mL of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Endocryl, Samarth Life Sciences, Mumbai Maharashtra, India) was injected followed by 1 mL of dextrose solution to completely flush the glue through the same needle. EUS and color Doppler were done 5 min after the glue injection to confirm the absence of flow in the treated varix. In case of persistent flow on Doppler or detection of any additional large patent GV, the endoscopic treatment described above was done in the same session. | Figure 1: (a) EUS: Gastric varices with flow on Doppler. (b): EUS-guided coil injection into the gastric varices. (c) EUS after 5 min injection of coil and glue demonstrates the absence of flow on Doppler (arrows)
Click here to view |
All patients had an underlying alcohol-related CP with one patient having a co-existent chronic pseudocyst [Table 1]. All patients presented with hematemesis and melena with three (50%) patients having postural symptoms. EUS-guided combined coil and glue injection was technically successful in all the six patients, with no instrument-related technical difficulty in any patient. A single coil was placed in four (66%) patients and two coils were placed in two (34%) patients. The median volume of cyanoacrylate glue injected was 1 mL (range 1–2 mL). There were no immediate postprocedure complications, and the GV obliteration was documented on EUS in all the patients. Patients with co-existent pseudocyst underwent successful EUS-guided transmural drainage with plastic stent after obliteration of the GV. The GVs were obliterated in all the patients on follow-up EUS done at 3 and 6 months. Over a mean follow-up period of 17 months, none of the treated patients had either early or delayed re-bleeding. There were no septic or embolic complications. In conclusion, EUS-guided combined coil and glue injection using an FVE seems to be safe and effective treatment for bleeding GV due to SVT in patients with CP. | Table 1: Profile of patients of chronic pancreatitis with bleeding gastric varices
Click here to view |
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
Surinder Singh Rana is an Editorial Board Member of the journal. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of this editor and his research groups.
| References | |  |
| 1. | Ahmed SU, Rana SS, Ahluwalia J, et al. Role of thrombophilia in splanchnic venous thrombosis in acute pancreatitis. Ann Gastroenterol 2018;31:371-8.  |
| 2. | Khoury T, Nadella D, Wiles A, et al. A review article on gastric varices with focus on the emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided angiotherapy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30:1411-5. |
| 3. | Liu Q, Song Y, Xu X, et al. Management of bleeding gastric varices in patients with sinistral portal hypertension. Dig Dis Sci 2014;59:1625-9. |
| 4. | Weber SM, Rikkers LF. Splenic vein thrombosis and gastrointestinal bleeding in chronic pancreatitis. World J Surg 2003;27:1271-4. |
| 5. | Fusaroli P, Ceroni L, Caletti G. Forward-view endoscopic ultrasound: A systematic review of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Endosc Ultrasound 2013;2:64-70. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1]
|
